Communities Need Voters

31 03 2011

Canadians once again go to the polls to elect a federal government on May 2nd. Whether you like the notion of another election or not, there’s no getting around the simple fact that voting is a cornerstone of democracy. Many Canadians have stayed home in past elections, resulting in an embarassingly low voter turnout. We’ll need to change that if this is to remain a stable democracy. Just as important, communities need their residents to get out and vote.

“One of our duties and privileges of citizens in a democracy is to cast a ballot. This is what we do to resolve our differences and give direction to our leaders. We vote.” That’s the Edmonton Journal’s Graham Thomson’s take on it. “One of the best defences against oppression is democracy. We’ve had three elections since 2004 because the people of Canada in their collective wisdom elected back-to-back-to-back minority governments (once to the Liberals and two most recently to the Conservatives). Get involved, even if that means simply reading the papers or watching the news. Ask -heck, grill -your local candidates about issues you care about whether that’s health care, jobs, the environment, the Libyan mission or…”.

Thomson’s comments on March 26 sparked a lively seesaw of opinions. But it isn’t so much whether we agree with him about the way to exercise our democratic privilege as it is about the fact that we have a democratic privilege. Cliché or not, it’s about the hard-won right to put your mark on a ballot. It’s also about surrendering your right to complain or criticize if you don’t participate in the democratic process.

Municipal voter turnout has traditionally been the lowest, an ironic and sad reality given that most of us are more closely tuned-in to local issues than to provincial or federal ones. But remember that many of the issues we grapple with locally have trickle-down influences from provincial and federal levels. Economic policy can be tied to local communities just as surely as immigration policies can impact a multicultural city such as Hamilton. The Hamilton Spectator’s Code Red series included a call for getting the vote out and pointed to the (then) fledgling Hamilton Civic League’s work to encourage Hamiltonians to vote. The group identified four segments of the population that vote in disproportionately low numbers: renters, people living in poverty, students and young people, and new Canadians, even after they’ve obtained citizenship.

Younger people (those under 35) are the group least likely to cast a ballot. Sadly, that’s due in part to our failure to educate and engage them in the democratic landscape. Finding ways to encourage young voters is something that ultimately helps us all. The Ottawa Citizen, in 2006, referred to it as exercising your franchise: “It conjures up images of voters wheezing on treadmills or pumping iron, desperately trying to whip their flabby democratic muscles into shape. But on reflection, the expression is really quite apt. After all, the act of voting is how citizens keep their democracy fit. Without the workout of an election, democracy would quickly sink into morbid obesity.” Maybe the idea that voting is fitness will attract more people to the polls on May 2nd, and on every election day after that.

See www.rockthevote.com (U.S. organization dedicated to engaging and building the political power of young people). Watch for “Get Out the Vote Canada” (a Facebook page).





Child Honouring

28 03 2011

Canadian children’s entertainer Raffi has a project that is inspiring and worth passing along…you can find details about it at his web site: www.raffinews.com.

“Child Honouring” is the singer/author’s approach to healing communities with a “child first” philosophy…organizing society around the needs of its youngest members. Its founder says “its spirit is invitational – a call to imagine and create a diversity of child-friendly cultures. A child-honouring society would show love for its children, and therefore for all of us, in every facet of its design and organization”.

The Child Honouring project includes a Covenant for Honouring Children along with Child Honouring Principles (for a .pdf version of these, click here: http://www.raffinews.com/files/child_honouring/covenant_principles.pdf. There are also resources for teachers and parents.

Hailed as a “compassion revolution”, Raffi’s project has elements of earth-friendly ecology and global peace as well as child-first concepts that include ideas for action and plenty of inspiration. The project’s Advisory Council includes such notables as Dr. Fraser Mustard (of Early Years fame), Elise Miller (founder and Executive Director of the National Institute for Children’s Environmental Health), Dr. Charles E. Pascal (Executive Director, Atkinson Charitable Foundation) and Joel Solomon (Chair, Tides Foundation).

The Washington Post once called Raffi Cavoukian “the most popular children’s entertainer in the western world”. The Order of Canada recipient is respected not only for his craft and talent, but also for refusing commercial endorsements and shunning marketing directly to children. This latest initiative will undoubtedly elevate his standing as a global advocate for children and an ally to parents and educators everywhere.





Sad Day to be a Girl

18 03 2011

Maybe it’s the warmer weather, or the peek of colour from crocus blooms in my garden today, but I started off with such a cheery disposition…then the media barrage began. First I read that this coming Sunday, March 20th, is the first International Anti-Street Harassment Day. Apparently a day is needed to remind us that catcalls, leers, sexual innuendo and whistles (aka street harassment) are inappropriate. I would like to think offensive behaviour is just that, offensive. Should be out of bounds each and every day. Activists would likely say I’m naive. I can’t fault their efforts to educate, and I recognize that this offensive harassment is often trivialized. According to www.StopStreetHarassment.com street harassment “includes sexually explicit comments, catcalls, groping, leering, stalking and assault, and more than 80 per cent of women have encountered it”. Learning that grim statistic makes me think a day set aside to expose the offenders isn’t such a bad idea (sad, but necessary).

Moving on with my day, I next discovered that Mattel Inc. has launched a new Barbie, called Clawdeen Wolf. This new doll’s purpose is…are you ready?…to help teach young girls about plucking and shaving. Now, I don’t want you to think I’m picking on Mattel here, but seriously…there are just too many issues here not to raise a few red flags. First, Clawdeen is clad in a micromini skirt, baring her navel, and is a ridiculous but no-longer-surprising size 2. It gets worse. The Globe & Mail reports that she boasts of being “a fierce fashionista with a confident no-nonsense attitude” and that shaving and plucking her “freaky flaws” is “a full-time job” (she’s a werewolf’s daughter, according to Mattel’s Monster High web site). Does Mattel think that the little girls who will actually play with this Barbie are in need of shaving guidance? More to the point, does Mattel see body hair as “a freaky flaw” and intend for young girls to see it that way too? Yes, Clawdeen is a toy. But she’s obviously marketed to young girls, and as toys go this is but another example of being off the mark in so many ways. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again…manufacturers need to hear from us when they so blatantly target children with messages that are sexualized and age inappropriate. Parents will no doubt be the most influential censors where purchases are concerned, but in the spirit of “it takes a village” (and recognizing that parents need all the help they can get) we should be all be offended, and vocally so. The Globe & Mail reports that Clawdeen is already a big seller, quoting a Toys ‘R’ Us spokesperson saying that Clawdeen is “the most popular fashion doll that we have today” and a Mattel spokesperson (defending the doll), saying she is “all about celebrating your imperfections and accepting the imperfections of others.”

Yes, it started out as a nice (almost spring) day. But it has turned out to be a sad day to be a girl.





Unity is strength.

17 03 2011

An old Irish saying…ní neart go cur le chéile…unity is strength. For our Japanese friends on this St. Patrick’s Day. Ar scáth a chéile a mhaireann na daoine…we all live in each other’s shadows.





A few bad apples…

14 03 2011

March is Fraud Prevention Month, prompting a quiz sponsored by CanadaHelps and Capital One concerning charitable giving. To take the online quiz and see how much you know about charitable fraud, click here: http://www.canadahelps.org/.

Charity fraud is rare in Canada despite media coverage that might suggest otherwise. In more than 20 years working in the charitable sector, with dozens and dozens of organizations, I have never once come across actual fraud. We have a reasonably strict system of monitoring and enforcement here in Canada, making it tough to scam donors or operate fraudulent charities. The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) pulls the plug on those who try, resulting in loss of charitable status or revoked registration.

Mark Blumberg’s Canadian Charity Law List for this month includes examples of this enforcement in action. “CRA has revoked the registration of The Organ Donation & Transplant Association of Canada for excessive fundraising and administrative fees and for involvement in an ‘international donation arrangement'”. Apparently this organization ran into trouble for gifts in kind whose real value didn’t match their reported value. Then there’s Pediatric AIDS Canada/USA, whose registration was also revoked by CRA for high fundraising costs and involvement in an “international donation arrangement that artificially inflated expenditures on charitable activities”.

Both these organizations were included in a recent Toronto Star article about charity fraud (“Plug pulled on charity after audit reveals money misspent”, March 7, 2011). The article essentially deals with six organizations where cases of charitable spending or reporting breaches led to CRA intervention. I point this out because six organizations out of thousands who conduct themselves legitimately is a very small number. Even if there are other, as yet undiscovered, fraudsters out there they remain a very small percentage of Canada’s overall charitable sector. The damage they inflict, however, can be devastating to all.

Donor diligence is the best defense against making contributions to fraudulent causes. But donors should not become alarmed and think that fraud is rampant in Canadian charities. It is not. A very few bad apples make it extremely challenging for legitimate charities to maintain goodwill and donor trust (and often add to the costs of operating a bona fide charity). Volunteers, too, can be skeptical about supporting the sector if they don’t feel their efforts are aligned with legitimate and legal purposes. So there’s much at stake (donors, volunteers, public opinion) for the good apples.

Updated charity laws, aggressive prosecution of lawbreakers, and accessible information for donors and volunteers are all helping to keep fraud to an absolute minimum in Canada. One bad apple is one too many, but it’s important that the entire sector not be branded criminals by a very few examples of cheating, fraudulent fundraising, or illegal scams.

For more information, check these resources:

http://www.canadiancharitylaw.ca

http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/charities





100 Years of International Women’s Day

7 03 2011